<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Slavik M and Bosman J. Traffic loadings estimated from counts. 3rd International Road Federation/South African Road Federation Regional Conference for Africa. Durban, South Africa, September 2006.

 

Abstract

The most accurate way to determine traffic loadings would be to weigh heavy vehicles statically. This is unpractical for obvious reasons and weigh-in-motion (WIM) measurement of traffic loadings are reverted to as a “second best” option. WIM traffic data, however, is very expensive and is only available at a limited number of counting stations. The aim of this paper is to develop a methodology to estimate traffic loadings from normal loop counts as a “third best” option. In this option the number of long trucks (LT) (18m or longer) expressed as a percentage of all the trucks on a road was used to stratify roads into three groups ( roads with LTs less than 35 %, LTs between 35 % - 55 %, and LTs over 55 %). The law enforcement strength (strong and weak) was used to as a further stratification of the three road groups. Five different traffic loading cases were developed and WIM measured axle load distributions were constructed for each of these. Although the correlation between the axle loads and percentage long trucks is not very good yet, this method can be used by designers in the absence of better traffic loading data. Standard specifications for traffic data collection by the South African National Roads Agency Limited (SANDAL) may improve the accuracy of estimated traffic loadings from ordinary traffic counts in future.

 

TABLE 1. Five Traffic-loading Model WIM Stations

Type

WIM

Abbr

Road

Direction

Lanes/Dir

COT no

 T1

Kliprivier

KLPnb

N12

northbound

    3

 3006

 T2

Winkelspruit

WNKnb

N2

northbound

    2

 3012

 T3

Komati

KMTeb

N4

eastbound

    1

 3047

 T4

Hidcote

HDCsb

N3

southbound

    2

 3021

 T5

Heidelberg

HDBsb

N3

southbound

    3

 3059

 

 

TABLE 2. Traffic and Sample Sizes at the Five Traffic-loading Model Stations in 2005

Type

Abbrev.

ADT/dir

ADTT/dir

   HV

  HV-ax

 T1

KLPnb

32451

 1618

367147

1512495

 T2

WNKnb

11898

   951

317918

1444444

 T3

KMTeb

  1619

   222

 46932

 210335

 T4

HDCsb

  7223

 1995

593819

3154415

 T5

HDBsb

  5082

 1052

325177

1703140

 

 

TABLE 3. Key Figures of the Five Traffic-loading Types in 2005

Type

%LHV

Law E.

Model

%LHV

t/ax

E80/ax

ax/HV

E80/HV

 T1

Below 35

Any

KLP nb

 29.8

4.845

0.411

4.12

1.69

 T2

35 - 55

Weak

WNKnb

 42.2

5.080

0.574

4.54

2.61

 T3

35 - 55

Strong

KMT eb

 48.9

5.279

0.415

4.48

1.86

 T4

Over 55

Weak

HDC sb

 60.6

5.984

0.583

5.31

3.10

 T5

Over 55

Strong

HDB sb

 58.4

5.783

0.453

5.24

2.37

 

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors wish to express their gratitude to:

 

NTRV (Northern Toll Road Venture, the N1 Toll Road Concessionaire),

N3TC (N3 Toll Concession, the N3 Toll Road Concessionaire),

TRAC (Trans African Concessions, the N4 Toll Road Concessionaire),

Bakwena (the N4 Platinum Toll Road Concessionaire), and

SANRAL (South African National Roads Agency Limited).

 

for their kind permission to use their traffic loading data.

 

Further acknowledged is the financial assistance of the The Concrete Institute that made extensive WIM data re-processing possible.